Standaard Boekhandel gebruikt cookies en gelijkaardige technologieën om de website goed te laten werken en je een betere surfervaring te bezorgen.
Hieronder kan je kiezen welke cookies je wilt inschakelen:
Technische en functionele cookies
Deze cookies zijn essentieel om de website goed te laten functioneren, en laten je toe om bijvoorbeeld in te loggen. Je kan deze cookies niet uitschakelen.
Analytische cookies
Deze cookies verzamelen anonieme informatie over het gebruik van onze website. Op die manier kunnen we de website beter afstemmen op de behoeften van de gebruikers.
Marketingcookies
Deze cookies delen je gedrag op onze website met externe partijen, zodat je relevantere communicatie op onze eigen website en relevantere advertenties van Standaard Boekhandel op externe platformen te zien krijgt.
Je kan maximaal 250 producten tegelijk aan je winkelmandje toevoegen. Verwijdere enkele producten uit je winkelmandje, of splits je bestelling op in meerdere bestellingen.
The study postulates that the field of Catholic moral theology has reached an impasse and proposes a way of approaching and understanding that impasse by focusing on the case study of homosexuality. By taking into account scientific research, magisterial teaching, and theological-ethical reflection on homosexuality, it arrives at the insight that the impasse, at least when it comes to the issue of homosexuality, is not to be found in the fact that the magisterium has taken a position on homosexuality, but in the presupposition that the ethical evaluation of homosexuality has been settled at the moment when the magisterium has done so. This insight emerges clearly as one brings various discourses on homosexuality together and allows them to challenge each other, thereby revealing that even the most basic questions such as, "What is homosexuality?", remain disputed and in need of a further discussion. Insofar as that state of the debate is not reflected in the presupposition that led to the impasse in moral theology when it comes to the issue of homosexuality, this "glaring oversight" raises a suspicion that the actual source and nature of the impasse might not be tied to the issue of homosexuality but to how the discipline of moral theology functions or is expected to function.