Standaard Boekhandel gebruikt cookies en gelijkaardige technologieën om de website goed te laten werken en je een betere surfervaring te bezorgen.
Hieronder kan je kiezen welke cookies je wilt inschakelen:
Technische en functionele cookies
Deze cookies zijn essentieel om de website goed te laten functioneren, en laten je toe om bijvoorbeeld in te loggen. Je kan deze cookies niet uitschakelen.
Analytische cookies
Deze cookies verzamelen anonieme informatie over het gebruik van onze website. Op die manier kunnen we de website beter afstemmen op de behoeften van de gebruikers.
Marketingcookies
Deze cookies delen je gedrag op onze website met externe partijen, zodat je op externe platformen relevantere advertenties van Standaard Boekhandel te zien krijgt.
Je kan maximaal 250 producten tegelijk aan je winkelmandje toevoegen. Verwijdere enkele producten uit je winkelmandje, of splits je bestelling op in meerdere bestellingen.
How deleted or destroyed paperwork impacts organizational capacity and memory—and allows power to evade accountability.
Administrative documents mediate bureaucracies and trust in them, making organizational life possible. In Destruction of Documents, Andrew Whelan argues that the politics of paperwork are most explicit when the paper trail is deleted, burned, shredded or otherwise done away with.
Exploring how irreconcilable administrative ideals have been understood across historical and cultural contexts, the author shows that the destruction of administrative documents both legitimates and conceals the organized irresponsibility of bureaucratic power.
From radical calls for liberation through burning the files to demands for their salvage in the service of justice, the book presents an analysis across four case studies: the Nechaev affair, an 1870s controversy concerning Russian revolutionaries; the shredding of files in the US Embassy in Tehran in 1979; the “right to be forgotten” in the contemporary data economy; and the 2018 scheduling of environmental records at the US National Archives. Across the case studies, the author describes how political power escapes accountability, and thereby secures continuity, by exceeding the material constraints of the media through which it operates. The destruction of bureaucratic media is thus central to how administrative authority is legitimated: renewing a tacit social contract while deferring its fulfillment.